Simon Mainwaring. The We First Blog.

Is social media the web’s weapon against war

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3VoyjUP8hg

At a time of so much unrest in the Arab world from Yemen, to Egypt, to Saudi Arabia, to Qatar, to Syria, to Bahrain, and to Libya, I wanted to share this short video by war photographer, James Nachtway. What he says about photography applies equally well to social or citizen media, in that by humanizing war social media plays a powerful role in the cry for peace. His eloquent words make sense of the resonance of the videos and photos shared tirelessly around the world and also of the tragic human cost of innocent lives.

This ability to connect people around shared values makes social media important in times of war and peace. Business practices and how we treat the planet are also in desperate need of re-humanization. When people align around shared political, social, economic or environmental values, and take collective action, thinking and behavior that compromises the lives of millions of people around the world can truly change.

As such, our engagement with social technology is both an opportunity and a responsibility. It is a potential weapon of choice for this generation to shape the future and our world.

To find out more about James Nachtway’s breathtaking work and TED Prize wish, visit here. We extend our thanks and respect for a lifetime of art and service.

READ MORE

Why storytelling and social media need each other to survive

Image: Fight pink

As the business marketplace continues to integrate social technology, it’s tempting to say that the arrival of social media is as revolutionary as the digital revolution was ten years ago. It’s also tempting to think that social media agencies will rob traditional media companies, whether they are advertising agencies or PR firms, of a large share of their clients ad spend just as digital companies have done. But such an outlook overlooks one key fact: social media needs powerful storytelling to thrive, just as brand storytellers must now embrace social media. Here’s why.

It’s easy to mistake social media as an end in themselves, but the currency that marketers and communities of all types still trade is emotion. In order for a brand to market itself effectively and to connect deeply with its community, it must tell a story that captures the attention of that audience and allows them to become emotionally invested in it. For that to happen, a brand must define itself clearly and articulate its core values, and then communicate them consistently. But that can only happen if a brand has defined its own narrative in the first place. Only by having defined itself can a brand maintain a compass in a marketplace where technology changes so quickly.

As such I contend that storytellers and social media marketers cannot survive without each other. Too often storytellers schooled in traditional media don’t possess, profess or practice sufficient social technology expertise to adequately serve their clients. On the other hand, social media companies often don’t have the hard won storytelling expertise of traditional ad agencies.

That’s why I believe the most effective solution for a brand today lies in a combination of the two. For a truly effective social campaign, a brand needs to embrace the first principles of marketing, which involves brand definition and consistent storytelling. They must then trade in the timeless currency of emotion using traditional and social media. Finally they must moderate any conversation about the brand even as consumers are co-authoring the stories that brands are telling, augmenting any positive exchanges and tempering the negative.

The future, therefore, belongs to those brands and their marketing partners who offer the best of traditional advertising with the latest in emerging technology. For this reason, advertising agencies are as relevant as ever if they bring the same creativity to bear on technology that they do to ideas. Likewise, social media companies must combine their mastery of the latest in real-time, location based or augmented reality technologies in the service of clear and consistent storytelling. Only then can a brand confidently expect that its community of customers or fans will go to work for it providing that other timeless trait of effective marketing, word-of-mouth advertising.

Do you agree that storytelling is as important to a brand as social media? What brands do you think are combining the two effectively?

READ MORE

AOL365: Why doing good work does wonders for a brand

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7I6Q3IbHac

Last week at the SXSW conference in Austin, Texas,  I had the pleasure of meeting Blair Cobb, the Director of AOL Cause Marketing. Their new AOL365 program is exactly the type of for-profit and non-profit partnership that I describe in We First as a critical path to a more sustainable and prosperous future. Blair was kind enough to share some insights into the program and explain what such purposeful engagement is doing for the AOL brand.

SM: Hi, Blair. Tell me about what AOL is doing in the social change space and how that came about.

BC: I’m director of Cause Marketing for AOL, which is actually a brand new department for them as of this past June. I came from the sales sector—very much the corporate business side of AOL—working with some of the top cause brands in the space, including General Mills. In sales we started to see that there was something of a ‘white space’ in AOL for when advertisers come to us with a cause marketing partnership that they’ve already cultivated, how can we as AOL be a platform for that? And how is AOL also reaching out to our own non-profit partners individually?

So back in November of 2010 we launched our Cause Module which is on the AOL homepage and reaches 15 million people a day. It is a commitment made by our CEO, Tim Armstrong, to create a platform (now called AOL365) where 365 days a year, this space is specifically dedicated to promoting causes so that every single day we promote a new cause on the AOL homepage.

We do this in two ways. The first is that we work with advertising partners of ours.  Toyota was our first partner to do this, so they had an ad featured on the AOL homepage that was linked to their own site. So we used that to tell our audience, in this example, about their partnership with the Audubon Society.

On days when we don’t have advertising partners taking advantage of the module, it’s a time where AOL’s cause marketing group reaches out to do partnerships with non-profit partners and promote them every day. It has created incredible partnerships for AOL. To date we have run over 3.5 billion pro bono, added value impressions on behalf of our non-profit partners and the advertisers that support them.

It’s an incredible reevaluation of AOL’s toolbox and learning what it is we have at our disposal and discovering what value we can provide in the social cause space. It’s about our audience and our commitment to dedicating a space that, otherwise, would be going for a lot of money everyday on the homepage, we’re giving it away for free.

In the absence being able to of giving large checks to our non-profit partners, we can give them our eyeballs of 15 million people, which in most cases is more valuable than cutting a check.  Yes, I sit in a large corporation, but I get to work, everyday, with advertisers who care and non-profits who are trying to get their word out.

SM: What are the rewards to a brand? Why should others follow your example?

BC:  One way in which we’ve seen this start to have impact is that about fifty percent of our modules to date have been advertiser driven, so obviously there is a large sector of AOL advertisers who are deeply involved in this space, but we also have our sector of top 100 advertisers that don’t have causes. It has become a really interesting space because they know they have the home page and the space, but some advertisers don’t have causes, so they come to our group to ask who they should partner with.

This space on our website has become a great awareness tool. Connecting the for-profit advertisement with a brand’s non-profit partnership or cause sometimes enables us to drive 10 times more traffic to the co-branded non-profit page. For non-profits and advertisers, it’s an amazing way to unleash and unlock a whole different audience. When an individual sees the impact a brand is having, they are more inclined to support them.

SM:  So any word of advice for any brands who are considering entering into this space?

BC: Work within your means. Every company is different, every company has assets they can bring, whether it’s dollars, space, merchandise that they can donate. All companies have a space within them, an asset or a toolbox, that they can use to give back. With us, it’s eyeballs, our audience. We are a 25-year old company with a very loyal following.  I don’t think there is one definition of doing good. In the past it was always about ‘how many dollars you can raise,’ but that’s not our goal here.  We just want to use our platform to help and create causes.

I would challenge all companies who are not actively involved with CSR or giving back, to take a look at what it is they have and use those assets in a dynamic, different way. I can’t even tell you the responses we’ve gotten from our advertising partners who have come back wanting to work with us more because we are the only partner out there offering this kind of added value.

I’m extremely proud of what we’re doing as a company at large. It really puts proof to action.  It’s great to say that you’re in the business of helping people, but when you can actually quantify it and point to the arms of your company that you’re mobilizing to do good, it changes everything.

SM:  Thank you so much for your time.  So where should we look to see your work?

BC: You can visit the AOL homepage (aol.com).  You can follow us on twitter @aol365 or you can go to 365.aol.com, which is our landing page experience, where we are creating a living, breathing gallery for all of our non-profit partners that we have featured to date, and bring our consumers that much closer to be able to enact and encourage and get involved with these non-profits.

Do you think more brands should align themselves with cause partners? What are some other tools corporations can use to drive social change?

READ MORE